By
Amir Mateen and M.Arshad
|
When Zafarullah Khan Jamali was anointed
as prime minister, many argued as to what political course
he might adopt. Would he go the Zulfikar Ali Bhutto way
by taking on the establishment full blast, follow Mohammad
Khan Junejo's style of using the establishment's crutches
to gradually assert his own independence, or adopt Nawaz
Sharif's and Benazir Bhutto's neither-here-nor-there approach
that led to their exile.
In the end, the man from Jhattpatt followed
what can only be described as the Jamali model. This entailed
total obedience to the 'boss'.
And yet his fate was not dissimilar from
those of earlier occupants. Jamali's stint as the prime
minister, however, was worse in the way he was reportedly
mistreated by his masters.
Zafarullah Jamali, nicknamed Jabal, which
means 'mountain', was reduced to a rolling stone that
was kicked about, mostly on petty things. For instance,
he once asked a serving lieutenant- general if he could
deliver on the contents of his briefing. He was officially
reprimanded that he should mind his manners while talking
to the uniformed cadre.
Former education minister Zubaida Jalal
is said to have got him a demarche for being 'sexist'
while questioning her prolonged post-pregnancy leave.
Neelofar Bakhtiar was another regular
complainant against the prime minister. Rais Munir was
yet another. There was believed to be a whole group of
presidential favourites, including politicians, bureaucrats
and particularly army officers posted on civilian posts,
who filed childish complaints against the prime minister.
The stories of Jamali being scolded were then relished
at Islamabad's elitist dinner parties.
This was despite the fact that Jamali
had apparently decided from day one that he would not
challenge the might of the establishment, whatever the
circumstances. He did not want to repeat the mistake of
dissolving yet another assembly, the first being that
of Balochistan in 1988. He was content to have a 'moth-eaten'
prime ministership with no say in selecting his cabinet
members. All major bureaucratic appointments, not just
those of secretaries and ambassadors, but key posts like
PTV managing director or PEMRA chief, had to be cleared
by the presidency. He was even pressured into changing
his personal staff.
There were cases, it is said, when he
was asked to remove serving officials to adjust retired
nominees of the president. There remained about 6,000
serving and retired army personnel posted on civilian
jobs in which he had no say.
Jamali acceded to every presidential stricture
and put up with open rebellion by his cabinet ministers.
He even bowed down before the 17th Amendment, death knell
for any premier, which also entailed the president-controlled
National Security Council. He sat at meetings nodding
robotically to every word that the president uttered.
And yet he was kept under constant threat of being removed.
For most part of his tenure he remained
on his toes, running between power centres, sometimes
even to the level of politicians like Kabir Ali Wasti,
who was to come out with a strong denunciation of the
premier.
It is suggested that he was even made
to explain his conduct, to control his peculiar wit, and
then told that he should stop entertaining particular
guests. He could go on foreign tours only when approved
by the boss. The list of journalists accompanying him
was also vetted. Eyebrows were raised at one thing or
the other. He was accused of trying to establish his independent
contacts with the Americans. The basis of this charge
was an informal exchange that Jamali had with US Secretary
of State Collin Powell during his last visit to Washington.
The list of charges reportedly grew longer
in the final weeks of his tenure. A campaign was launched
to unnerve him, and official machinery was used to prepare
the people for the change.
What is now being painted as the party's
decision was decided by just one person. According to
information pieced together, at the last supper that took
place on the eve of Jamali's departure, Chaudhri Shujaat
Hussain tried to persuade Jamali to withdraw in favour
of Liaquat Jatoi, as Liaquat was seen as a better choice
than Humayun Akhtar, who the Chaudhris thought would make
it to the prime ministership.
Jamali, in turn, offered that he would
withdraw only if Shujaat was the candidate. Incidentally,
Jatoi was the last person that Jamali met at the PM House
at noon before leaving for the presidency.
The first thing that the president is
said to have told him was that he should resign. Jamali
did not resist even for a second, much to the relief of
the president who had been told by his aides that Jamali
was up to something mischievous. President Musharraf reciprocated
by seeking his advice on the selection of his successor.
There were in all 11 candidates for the post. It was shortened
to four names, Shujaat Hussain, Aftab Sherpao, Mohammad
Mian Soomro and Shaukat Aziz.
Shaukat Aziz probably was the lone candidate
from the start, but Jamali was given the impression as
if things rested on his advice. He fought for Shujaat
Hussain's case, arguing that he wanted to return a favour
to the person who had got him elected in the first place.
Jamali was then told that the real name would be conveyed
to him later.
The two came out when the president announced
that Jamali had graciously agreed to resign before his
six aides. Chaudhri Shujaat and Chaudhri Pervaiz Elahi
waited anxiously in a side room.
The trio of Jamali, Shujaat and Pervaiz
returned to the PM House, where Jamali told them that
he had tried his best for Chaudhri Shujaat's selection.
The trio waited for a call with bated breath.
When it finally came, Jamali heard it
while the Chaudhris looked on. Jamali told them the decision,
first the bit about Chaudhri Shujaat's prime ministership
and then about Shaukat Aziz. Shujaat was overwhelmed by
the news and in fact became quite emotional. Then he made
Jamali talk to his mother, who gave the PM her blessings.
The trio then proceeded to announce the decision at the
PML House.
It is yet to be seen what model Chaudhri
Shujaat or his successor, if elected, might adopt. Incidentally,
the Chaudhri was given a taste of what life was like for
Jamali when on the very first day, he got a demarche for
not making it adequately clear that he was just a stop-gap
prime minister for Shaukat Aziz. It is possible that the
Chaudhris, in their excitement, had not fully understood
the bit about Shaukat Aziz.