Musharraf strengthens grip on nukes, power
|
By Maqbool Arshad
|
Pakistan's National Command Authority
held its meeting on November, during which Islamabad
decided to consolidate its nuclear weapons management
under the control of General Pervez Musharraf. The decision
deters military adventurism by Pakistan's archrival,
India. The consolidation also puts Musharraf in a position
of strength in terms of international bargaining and
fighting off his enemies within Pakistan.
Pakistan's National Command Authority
(NCA) held its meeting in Rawalpindi on at the Strategic
Plans Division, The Nation reported. Pakistan's Chief
Executive General Pervez Musharraf, who leads the NCA,
chaired the meeting. During this last session, the NCA
made decisions to consolidate its nuclear weapons management
system.
Musharraf is reforming Pakistan's nuclear
sector and command system as a strategic deterrent to
India. He wants to consolidate his power in the country,
which is driven by different and antagonistic forces.
Musharraf needs the added strength in order to negotiate
with the international community - and within his own
country.
The NCA was established in February
2000 to create command and control mechanisms for Pakistan's
nuclear weapons and missile systems. It is responsible
for policy formulation, employment and development control
over all strategic nuclear forces and strategic organizations.
Besides Musharraf, the NCA includes foreign affairs,
defense and interior ministers, chiefs of all military
services and heads of strategic organizations.
Pakistan has no intention of abandoning
its nuclear program, at least in the near future; when
a country enhances its nuclear weapons command and control
system, it generally reveals the opposite. For Islamabad,
nuclear weapons provide a final trump card in a possible
conflict with its much bigger rival,
India has Pakistan outmanned and outgunned,
both overall and in conventional forces and arms. There
are approximately 980,000 active Indian troops and another
800,000 in reserve. In comparison, Pakistan has an estimated
562,000 active soldiers and 500,000 reservists. India
boasts 3,600 tanks to Pakistan's 2,200, and the Indian
air force maintains 890 fighting aircraft as compared
to Pakistan's 620.
Pakistan has worked hard to gain the
advantage in number of conventional arms. Once Pakistan
achieves some success, India once again upsets Pakistan's
hard-earned advantage. For example, this year has witnessed
the beginning of production of Pakistan's new major
battle tank, Al-Khalid. This 46 ton, three-man tank
was built with Chinese help and has a maximum speed
of 40 mph. With a cruising range of 250 miles, it is
indeed superior to India's Arjun tank. But India signed
a US$3 billion package with Russia last month, and New
Delhi is building and will receive 310 of Russia's newest
major battle tanks, the T-90s, which beat Al-Khalid
in every parameter. The same is true of combat aircraft
and naval ships.
Pakistan maintains a first-strike option
in its nuclear doctrine. With India outgunning Pakistan's
conventional forces at every turn, the accepted use
of nuclear weapons in response to a conventional attack
sends a message to New Delhi that, despite its larger
military, Pakistan is not incapable of defending itself.
Pakistan also had a nuclear advantage
because its chief of the army staff had been in charge
of nuclear planning and deployment, even when there
was a civilian head of government. Last month, India
hoped to catch up with Pakistan on the issue of nuclear
planning and management by introducing a new high command
structure.
Islamabad's response was to integrate
all research, design, production, planning and deployment
of nuclear weapons in the NCA under Musharraf's control,
once again positioning itself above its archrival. India
still does not have a centralized nuclear authority
body such as Pakistan's NCA, and its political and military
branches of power are not linked together with regard
to nuclear weapons. India's civilian government executes
full control over design, research and production of
nuclear weapons, while the Indian military is in charge
of operational control over nuclear weapons.
Pakistan's government is concerned with
not only nuclear but also missile capability. Musharraf
also has established a Strategic Force Command led by
a serving army general responsible for deployment of
strategic missiles. Pakistan possesses two versions
of a medium-range nuclear-capable missile called Ghauri.
Its Shaheen-1 and Shaheen-11 also belong to the same
class of missiles. The existing version of the Ghauri
missile is operational and has a range of 800 to 1,200
miles; the ability to carry nuclear, biological and
chemical warheads; and the ability to be launched from
land or air. The missile is said to be equipped with
an extremely accurate guidance system.
By all these parameters, the Ghauri
is superior to India's medium-range missile Prithvi.
It means Pakistan's missile-launching abilities are
higher than those of India. Pakistan also may have tested
a new version of the Ghauri with a range of up to 1,800
miles that amounts to a new class of missile - not medium
range, but the so-called long-range missiles. To counter
Pakistan's temporary superiority, India is actively
working in two directions: first, to improve characteristics
and range of its medium-range missiles, and second,
to create its first intercontinental ballistic missile
(ICBM) with a range of 5,000 to 8,000 miles.
By further integrating and strengthening
its nuclear command system under the NCA, Pakistan is
trying to better position itself for future challenges
in the region. The first test is probable talks with
India, in which Pakistan would be able to talk from
a position of strength, not weakness. The NCA will guard
the work of organizations such as the Khan Research
Laboratories (KRL) led by Dr Qadeer Khan, who is considered
the mastermind of Pakistan's nuclear program, the National
Development Complex (NDC) and the Pakistan Atomic Energy
Commission (PAEC). Thus, Musharraf is reining in the
very strong, nearly autonomous civilian nuclear research
and development agencies. This will add to consolidation
of his authority in the country as a whole and in the
nuclear field in particular.
Musharraf has made himself the sole
caretaker for the country's nuclear arsenal. This will
make it much more difficult for someone else to use
Pakistan's nuclear weapons and strategic missiles without
Musharraf's authorization. He faces the threat of some
hardline factions within the military, Inter-Service
Intelligence and radical Islamic circles whose influence
in the country grows. Any of these internal threats
may try to gain access to the Pakistani nuclear arsenal
- either for striking India or "the enemies of
Islam".
Musharraf also may have more authority
and negotiation power while dealing with the United
States and other Western powers. He needs it for discussing
the nuclear proliferation problem and Pakistan's adherence,
or non-adherence, to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
(CTBT). Musharraf can demonstrate the international
community should not worry about Pakistan's non-adherence
to CTBT because its nuclear weapons are now under complete
control of secular- and reform-minded Musharraf.
Restructuring export control mechanisms
through the NCA also means Musharraf is strengthening
his control over the export of fissile materials and
nuclear technology. In addition to Musharraf taking
this important field under his tight control, the move
is also an attempt to reverse the worsening of Pakistan-US
relations. It is meant to send a positive signal to
America that Pakistan is making an effort to tighten
its export controls on nuclear materials and technology.
Putting everything under Musharraf's
control does give him better leverage both inside and
outside the country. But it also gives him little flexibility
to place the responsibility on others if he is in a
tight spot and blamed for Pakistan's current and likely
future failures.
Also, it remains to be seen whether
this full control over Pakistan's nuclear arsenal will
be transferred from Musharraf as the top leader of Pakistan
to the country's civilian supreme authorities after
elections are held next year. In the status of the NCA,
there is no wording on the role of the Pakistani prime
minister or other top civilian authority as a future
head of the NCA. Also, if another military ruler replaces
Musharraf, there is no guarantee his successor would
pursue the same nuclear policy.
Nevertheless, integrating all decision-making
power over nuclear weapons within the NCA represents
the opportunity to gain full control over Pakistan's
nuclear arsenal. Provided the military does not rebel,
a future civilian government of the country would have
a chance to assert its authority over the whole nuclear
complex, since the NCA is not a military body
|